Whenever anyone deals with a poker site, it's business. Whether they play cash games, MTTs, set up a private tournament, or when the site offers them a spot to participate in a tournament. There's always a trade of goods of some kind. Most of the time, cash is traded for a chance to play, but other times, it's prizes for advertising or something similar.
I bring this up because I've recently heard people saying that they can't state their honest opinions about an event because they either "don't want to screw up what's been given" or they "have done well so they have to support it".
Hogwash.
If people don't complain about things, companies never discover that they aren't providing their customers with what they want. What that scenario ususally causes is the company's customers finding somewhere else to spend their money. Which is obviously not what the company wants.
Also, by reading this blog post, understand that you're the reason why bloggers get advertising money, are asked to do reviews, and get other perks. Blogs are a way to reach an audience, just like radio or television. But, the kicker with blogs is the audience is much more focused (e.g. players read poker blogs), so companies who want to reach that audience spend money or offer prizes in exchange for that ability.
Full Tilt is providing the BBT5 because it wants six weeks (or more) of constant "face time" in the blogosphere. Honestly, they don't care if the posts are positive or negative. We're still bringing them up. That's what matters.
I wrote a post a little while ago about why I didn't like the BBT5, but then I took it down. I didn't take it down because I changed my mind about the tournament. I took it down because I over-reacted emotionally in the post. I still don't like the BBT5 format and I still don't like the odds non-invitees are given (13 seats available versus 25). Honestly, the only people who are able to get a shot at all 25 available TOC seats are the people who played in the first Sunday Invitational. It's not a level playing field and I think that sucks.
Is it awesome that Full Tilt is running another edition of the BBT? Of course it is. It's very cool that our community is getting recognized in this manner. But, make no mistake about why Full Tilt is running the tournament. It's offering the BBT5 prizes in exchange for a large number of blogs writing about it for six weeks straight. We're branding their site and we're linking people directly to their blog. It's a business exchange, plain and simple.
So, if you write a blog, you're playing in the BBT5, and there's something you don't like about it, then write about it if it bothers you enough to do so. There won't be any repercussions from Full Tilt and if anyone has an issue with what you've wrote you they can leave a comment or contact you in another manner. If they don't do that, even if they say they will, that's not your problem. But, please don't keep quiet out of fear. Full Tilt might not get information that they want to know and you're staying silent for no valid reason.
Friday, April 30
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

9 comments:
I'm happy to see you re-considered the post. I have it on hard drive if you want a copy.
The cord you struck with me involved something deeper. The BBT is two tourneys under one name.
The files of all the 'invited' players are a matter of someones poker snooper records. The files of all the poker players ever to play in a blogger tourney are a matter of poker snooper records.
Some are public records. Some are shared records - as evidenced by blogger saying so in their blogs.
The invited players appeared to be of a group; divided 'A' and 'C' lister, divided not by blog ranking, but by poker snooper/public records rankings.
Invited players get two shots, the masses one, for half the prize pool.
Those accumulated poker snooper files and the invitation an angle shooters paradise.
Thanks, Tenmile, but I don't think I'll need that other post.
Why begrudge FT their prerogative to run whatever series they want?
It's obvious FT wants to maximize their investment by getting as many players who have a higher probability to promote or blog about FT should they reach the main event.
You're right, it's a business, their business. FT uses the BBT as a promotional vehicle and it's their right to do so as they choose.
It's not the series that I disagree with, Skidoo. It's the current format. Only a certain number of people have access to all of the TOC seats which, in my opinion, gives them an unfair advantage over non-invitees for reaching the TOC and winning the prizes. The reason that I have the right to state that I don't like it is because I'm a paying customer. FT isn't giving everyone a free ticket to the BBT tournaments. They're still collecting rake (except, of course, for the Sunday Invitationals). If other people disagree with me, that's fine.I don't have any problem with that. It's when people don't like the format, but they feel obligated to be positive on their blogs about it that I have an issue. That should never be the case in this situation.
One more thing, Skidoo: If FT wants to "maximize the number people who promote/blog" then, they should have set up a criteria like they did for the 6/6 tournament to verify that people who are currently writing on a regular basis obtained invitations to the Sunday tournaments. Based on the people who are playing on Sundays, that didn't happen.
I agree with your last point. Having people invited then sitting out should get them banned since it ruins the experience of the other players.
Reading Jordan's post today pisses me off more than being left out of the invitational in the first place.
I still contend they could have made the BBT5 all invitation only if they want and I'd have no problem. There's probably just as much value in going through the step process.
Kudos btw for expressing your opinion as I'm sure there are others who feel obligated to give FT good press.
Post a Comment